Juniors Sam Agranovich and Kayla Chang debate whether or not an act can be called a hate crime if there is no malicious intent behind it. Agranovich insists that context and intent are the defining factors in a hate crime, where Chang claims that the only reaction worth mentioning is the victims. Who do you side with? Vote below!
[socialpoll id=”2346549″]
By Annabelle Elmaleh Musical Guru Enjoy this playlist of some old and new songs that can channel your inner spirit animal (literally)! 1) “Anaconda” by […]
Video by Jackie Lee Managing Editor of News
By Gabrielle Pellegrin Opinions Contributor I moved from France to Boston eight months ago (February 2015). When I first heard about the attacks in Paris, […]